Coordinate Metrology Society logo

CMS-2010-015

Choosing Test Positions for Laser Tracker Evaluation and Future Standards Development

Bala Muralikrishnan, Daniel S. Sawyer, Christopher Blackburn, Steven D. Phillips, Craig Shakarji, Edward Morse, Robert Bridges

Title graphic for CMS-2010-015: Choosing Test Positions for Laser Tracker Evaluation and Future Standards Development

Abstract

Where should you put the targets when testing a laser tracker? Draft VDI/VDE 2617-10 has to specify positions that expose the errors a tracker actually has, without demanding a test that nobody can run. This team – NIST, joined by Ed Morse and by Robert Bridges of FARO – works through the choice of test positions for tracker evaluation and what it means for the standards then being developed, at the point where ASME B89.4.19 and the German draft were being weighed against each other across the industry.

Also published as CMSJ-06-1-02, The Journal of the CMSC, Volume 6, Number 1 (Spring 2011).

Cite this paper

Bala Muralikrishnan, Daniel Sawyer, Christopher Blackburn, Steven Phillips, Craig Shakarji, Ed Morse, Robert Bridges. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); University of North Carolina at Charlotte; FARO Technologies. Presented at the Coordinate Metrology Systems Conference 2010, Reno, Nevada, July 12-16, 2010. Coordinate Metrology Society, reference CMS-2010-015.